| < Page 2 of 2 |
| From: rai4u | Reply 21 of 37 | Reply | View replies (1)
|
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 26 |
1.the movable pulley parts r not perfectly rigid.
Posted at: Fri Feb 19 14:34:33 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: rai4u | Reply 22 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 26 |
1.the movable pulley parts r not perfectly rigid.2.the pulley is not
weightless
Posted at: Fri Feb 19 14:35:33 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: sonali16 | Reply 23 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 12 |
2.47
Posted at: Mon Feb 22 05:31:53 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: sonali16 | Reply 24 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 13 |
220 volts
Posted at: Mon Feb 22 05:32:36 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: sonali16 | Reply 25 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 33 |
Parallel to the base.
Posted at: Mon Feb 22 05:37:02 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: gauravshah10 | Reply 26 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 13 |
220 volts
Posted at: Sun Mar 7 10:57:11 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: gauravshah10 | Reply 27 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 51 |
thorium- A=234, Z=90 Protactamium-
A=234, Z=91
Posted at: Sun Mar 7 11:23:19 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: priyanka_naik | Reply 28 of 37 | Reply | View replies (1)
|
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 5 |
answer
(i)
Posted at: Sun Mar 7 14:33:40 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: priyanka_naik | Reply 29 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 5 |
answer
(i) f = mg
2=m x 10
m = 0.2kg
(ii) f =2x10
=20N
f = mg
20 = m x 10
m = 2kg
Posted at: Sun Mar 7 14:40:13 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 30 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: how?? |
Plz read the question properly ,it asks for a reason Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:32:02 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 31 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 26 |
even they r not frictionless
Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:34:54 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 32 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 27 |
it appears to be near
Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:35:34 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 33 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 28 |
lateral shift is directly proportional to the thickness AD
Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:36:42 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 34 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 30 |
violet
Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:37:07 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 35 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 32 |
it is-
virtual,erect and diminished
Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:38:18 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 36 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 35 |
echo
Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:39:09 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: harsimran | Reply 37 of 37 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 41 |
Q represents charge and V represents potential difference
Posted at: Tue Sep 28 11:42:44 2010 (GMT)
|
| < Page 2 of 2 |
