| < Page 2 of 10 > >> |
| From: nvabhishek11 | Reply 21 of 193 | Reply | View replies (1)
|
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 8 |
19.2rs
I am not sure abt this
dis answer might be false
u try dis once and comment on it frnds
Posted at: Sat Dec 26 13:52:21 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: nvabhishek11 | Reply 22 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 8 |
1356.8rs
I am not sure abt this
dis answer might be false
u try dis once and comment on it frnds
Posted at: Sat Dec 26 13:53:02 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: nvabhishek11 | Reply 23 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 9 |
19.2 RS
I am not sure abt this
dis answer might be false
u try dis once and comment on it frnds
Posted at: Sat Dec 26 13:53:23 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: nvabhishek11 | Reply 24 of 193 | Reply | View replies (1)
|
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 16 |
1
Posted at: Sat Dec 26 14:29:40 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: nvabhishek11 | Reply 25 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 16 |
2
Posted at: Sat Dec 26 14:29:55 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 26 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: ur ans. is wrong |
ans. is 55. Posted at: Sun Dec 27 16:33:36 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 27 of 193 | Reply | View replies (2)
|
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 19 |
80
Posted at: Sun Dec 27 16:37:51 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 28 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 19 |
80
Posted at: Sun Dec 27 16:38:47 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 29 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 19 |
100
Posted at: Sun Dec 27 16:41:33 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 30 of 193 | Reply | View replies (1)
|
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 18 |
55
Posted at: Sun Dec 27 16:44:37 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 31 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 21 |
1/7
Posted at: Sun Dec 27 17:17:03 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 32 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 22 |
3
Posted at: Sun Dec 27 17:17:22 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: mintu | Reply 33 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 23 |
3
Posted at: Sun Dec 27 17:17:33 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: chaitanyashah80 | Reply 34 of 193 | Reply | View replies (1)
|
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 28 |
66
Posted at: Mon Dec 28 14:00:39 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: sachinsurfs | Reply 35 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: confused |
could someone explain this one..I got rest of the angles...what do u mean by
BCD? theres no angle as BCD! Posted at: Mon Dec 28 19:58:23 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: sachinsurfs | Reply 36 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: :O |
i got 112 Posted at: Mon Dec 28 20:10:37 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: niksn10 | Reply 37 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 17 |
55
Posted at: Wed Dec 30 16:13:44 2009 (GMT)
|
| From: nutan2sweet | Reply 38 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 28 |
112 degree
180-68=(112)/2=56 degree=angle PRQ
derefore,
angle POQ=56*2=112 degree(becoz. POQ is d angle drwn frm d same segment n at
centre 2)
Posted at: Fri Jan 1 15:06:20 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: nutan2sweet | Reply 39 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: Contributed Answer/Explanation to Q. 29 |
68 degree
Posted at: Fri Jan 1 15:15:21 2010 (GMT)
|
| From: priyal | Reply 40 of 193 | Reply | |
| Subject: this explanation is wrong |
since (x-2) is a factor of p(x)..
therefore p(2) will be equal to 0 and not 2 as it is done in the above
explanation ! Posted at: Sun Jan 10 05:23:36 2010 (GMT)
|
| < Page 2 of 10 > >> |
